Jeremiah_Chapter_22_John_Karmelich
1.
Let's start with my title: "God and Politics". First this isn't a lecture about any current
politician. I simply want us to realize
what God expects of our leaders. Yes it
can apply to church or business leader as well. The short version is Jeremiah
uses this section to address the some of the last kings in Israel before that
place got completely wiped out for a seventy-year period. The essential idea is to grasp that if we're called
to any sort of leadership role, not only would we be accountable to those we
serve, but to God Himself. So if you're
curious as to what God has to say about what it is God expects of leaders I
encourage you to read through this lesson.
a)
The first thing you should realize is that since Israel's inception,
leadership was separated into political leaders and religious ones. It's only through Jesus that they merge. Through the entire Old Testament those
offices rarely merged. Sometimes the
judges did both, but it wasn't a positive thing. Through all the periods of kings, there were
"high priests" who were separate people from the political leaders.
For what it's worth I've heard a number of renown Christian preachers look back
at their involvement in politics as a mistake as they realized "God was
right" to separate those offices.
b)
The second thing to consider is that even though Jeremiah is going to
focus on the last of the Israelite kings, the principals behind this can apply
to any leadership role. So if you've got no desire to enter politics, this
lesson has personal applications in whatever role we're leading. At the least it can help us to realize how we
should be pray for our leaders, even the one's we're not crazy about. For what it's worth, Romans 13 as an example,
tells us we are to pray for our political leaders, so this isn't just an
"Old Testament" thing!
c)
This lesson is going to get into "Israel politics" shortly
before that nation came to an end. I am
not here to make us an expert on Middle East History around 600BC. I'm only telling us those facts to understand
some of the background that Jeremiah had to deal with as he preached to these
groups.
d)
Finally let me give one more "why should we care" speech
before I get into the specifics of these chapters. The underlying issue is what
God expects of our leaders. One of the
main things I've been preaching through Jeremiah is if we're saved, that also
means He expects to be a witness for Him. I would add that certain positions
come with extra accountability. For
example God holds bible teachers to a accountability as God expects accurate
teaching and practice of what we teach. (See James 3:1). The same concept
applies to our leaders. If we have such
a role, the good news is we've got authority and power. The bad news is we are
held accountable for it. So if we're not
crazy about our leaders, just remember that He holds them accountable. While we must live with their decisions,
ultimately it's God who they have to deal with.
I bring all that up, because this chapter focuses on some of the last
Israel kings has applications that apply to all of us as Christians.
2.
With that said, it's time for a "scorecard of the
players". First keep in mind what
can be confusing to a newcomer is the fact that Israel split into two kingdoms
after Solomon. The one to the North was
called "Israel". The one to
the south was called "Judah" named after its main tribe. When this
book was written "Israel" was long dead and all the kings here are
part of "Judah'. All the kings I'm
about to list here were direct descendants of King David (Solomon's father).
Realize that none of David's descendants ruled over the "North"
kingdom. If all that isn't confusing enough some of the kings listed in these
chapters have more than one name. OK,
here's the scorecard:
a)
Joash: The last good king. Died in battle. Reigned 31 years.
b)
Jehoahaz: One of Joash's
sons. Only ruled three months. Also called Shallum.
c)
Jehoiakim: Brother of Jehochin.
Ruled eleven years.
d)
Jehoiachin: Son of Jehoiakim. Also called Coniah elsewhere. Cursed by God (next page).
e)
Zedekiah. Brother of Jehoahaz
and Jehoiakim. Final king before the
captivity. Ruled for eleven years. He's "not in the picture" as
Jeremiah preached this section before his rule.
3.
I stated on the last page that the second to last king was cursed by
God. He had seven sons. God said in effect that none of his sons
would ever rule over Judah and that happened.
The curse was worse in the sense that it prevented the Messianic line
from continuing. My point is God made a
promise to Kind David around 1,000 BC that one of his sons would rule over
Israel forever. That prediction ties to
Jesus, who was a descendant of King David both from Mary and Joseph. That curse required the necessity of the
virgin birth. Let me explain this fairly
quickly.
a)
Mary was not a descendant of these kings. King David had other sons who
obviously did not rule in Israel. Mary
was a descendant of David's son Nathan (a different Nathan than the one
mentioned as a prophet in David's day).
Mary's genealogy is in Luke Chapter 3.
b)
Joseph was a direct descendant of the cursed king. Matthew 1 gives Joseph's genealogy.
c)
That's one reason why the virgin birth was necessary to get around that
curse!
d)
The other thing to realize is when a virgin gets married, all she owns
legally will belong to her husband. That was true both in Jewish and Roman
law. So Jesus "legal father"
became Joseph, and that's how Jesus became a legal descendant of those kings. It also fulfills the promise made to David
that one of his sons would rule forever.
e)
OK enough of that. I mention it
all here because the curse on Jehoiachin is in this chapter.
f)
It also fits my theme because we're dealing with the consequences of
being a bad leader!
4.
So is that it? These guys messed
up and God cursed them out? Can we go
now? No, it's a lot more than that! Let me quickly go over this chapter and
that'll be it for the introduction:
a)
The first five verses is the "overview of the chapter". This is where Jeremiah explains why Israel's
leaders were messing up. He mentions
such concepts of caring for those who can't care for themselves (uses widows
and foreigners as examples). No that
doesn't mean God expects the government to solve all our problems. It just
means we should help those who are less fortunate, through charity
efforts. Jeremiah also condemns robbery
and murder in the sense that leaders are in charge and injustice shouldn't be
tolerated. Jeremiah then is making a promise if the leaders do what's right,
they'd rule forever. If they don't, they will not. Obviously there's an element
of "it's too late" in the text, as the next few verses imply.
b)
Verses 6-10 are poetry style as hey condemn the leaders for failing to
lead properly.
c)
By Verse 11, Jeremiah gets personal.
He's saying in effect, "Yes your highness I'm talking about you
right now!" Just to prove that
Jeremiah is a prophet of God, he says to the first of the sons of Joash that
he'll be dragged away as a captive never to come back. Then we'll read why
God's so "ticked off" at this king.
The short version is he turned many Israelites into slave labor in order
to build the kings palace. I'll just add that the Old Testament has laws that
forbid such things. Again, the idea is
to lead fairly and "do the right thing".
d)
Then we get about ten verses dealing with his brother, the next
king. Let's just say it's not a lot
prettier for him as well. The short
version is Jeremiah predicts nobody will miss that king when he's gone.
e)
Finally Jeremiah has some choice words for "the uncle" who's
the next of the kings. This is the king who's so bad, God throws a curse on his
family. The 1st Chronicles 3 indicates he had seven children, so the curse
wasn't that he wouldn't have any kids. The curse is the fact that none of his
children would rule as descendants. That
starts the whole, "this leads to the virgin birth" requirement for
Jesus, but I've beaten that point to death already!
f)
Jeremiah finishes this section by getting more "general"
again. He's saying that it's not just
these particular kings who are in big trouble. It applies to anyone in a
leadership capacity. In fact he mentions
priests and prophets as if to say, "If you're going to teach about Me,
I'll just say you better do it right (i.e., nothing to contract the written
word) or you too, will be in big trouble.
Does that make me nervous? Yes it
does, and it makes me want to do a lot of research before writing these
studies. Anyway, I wanted to take on
this chapters as one lesson to discuss what God expects of leaders. With that
said, I hope you'll read the rest of the lesson as we discuss what God expects
of those in power using a few Israelite kings as examples. With that said, let's get started on this
chapter.
5.
Verse 1: This is what the LORD says: "Go down to
the palace of the king of Judah and proclaim this message there: 2 `Hear the word
of the LORD, O king of Judah, you who sit on David's throne--you, your
officials and your people who come through these gates.
a)
Let's start with
the reminder that there were no chapter breaks in the original text. We left the end of Chapter 21 with Jeremiah
throwing a curse on the city of Jerusalem because the people and the leaders of
that city had turned from God to false gods.
With that said, it is time for Jeremiah to "go straight to the top
of the food chain". Jeremiah was
told to preach at the leader's house.
Does that mean he invited himself in unwanted? Does it mean he is standing out front in ear
shot of the residence? Don't know, all I
do know is that whoever were the top officials someone got word of this as I
doubt Jeremiah was just preaching to himself at the point.
b)
Notice the
message isn't just to the king and no one else.
It's to the all the officials who're running that city. This is God saying, "It's judgment time
and you can't use the excuse of the fact you didn't know any better!" It's
in effect a not so subtle reminder that God judges all people, believers
included. So if we're "saved by
grace", what are we judged about?
It is a matter of what we did with what information we knew about God. Jesus talks about rewards in heaven and that
ties to what we did what the information we had about Him.
i)
The reason I
pound that point, is I don't want you to read this lesson and think, "O,
those poor kings who lived 2,500 years ago.
When we read how God judged them keep in mind we'll be facing His
judgment as well one day.
ii)
With that tough
thought rolling through our brain, back to Jeremiah!
6.
Verse 3: This is what the LORD says: Do what is just
and right. Rescue from the hand of his oppressor the one who has been robbed.
Do no wrong or violence to the alien, the fatherless or the widow, and do not
shed innocent blood in this place.
a)
Here we get to
the heart of the issue. What God expects
of our leaders is to do what is just and right.
The idea is to govern according to His laws. Does that mean God expects those who govern
to eat Kosher? Of course not. It means
as much as possible to not steal, make decisions that are as fair as possible,
don't cheat people and do what's best for those we're in charge of. The issue here has nothing to do with one's
personal life. God will judge us on that
separately. The issue here is strictly
our roles as leaders.
i)
What if I don't
like the decisions my leader is making and assuming I can't do any significant
thing to change that? Then remember that
leader is accountable to God and He'll deal with that leader His way on His
timing. Have there been leaders in my
country I don't like, lots of them.
However, I can't change what I can't change, so I pray for them and remember
that they're accountable to God for their actions.
b)
From there,
Jeremiah gives examples of what's right and just: "Do no wrong, nothing that is violent to
an alien fatherless (think children), or widow (no one to protect them).
Finally a plea to not shed blood in a place.
i)
Let me try to use
a recent political example. In the
United States a big issue here is lots of people trying to get into this
country illegally. I believe that every
country's right to sovereignty in terms of having borders and deciding who can
and can't go into that country. Many
people want to come here just for the opportunities we've got here. The reality is a country only has so many
resources and it's acceptable to limit the number of people who come into a
country let alone do one's best to find out people's background before letting
them in. Tough decisions have to be made. One can't simply have an open border
policy due to safety and again all places we can live would have limited
resources so tough choices have to be made.
ii)
My simple point
is when it comes to making tough decisions, we should always be praying for
God's guidance and then make the best decisions we can given what is the
information in front of us. Decisions
that don't violate God's will, we're free to make the best decisions we can in
such cases.
c)
All of that leads
back to this verse. The reason Jeremiah
was being so hard on Israel's top guys is they were failing to do this. Not talking about controversial decisions
that are not in any violation of God's Word.
We're talking about stealing to benefit themselves or say, being cruel
to the less fortunate of the world.
That's the issue here.
i)
So if God's going
to judge them for what they've done, why is Jeremiah at this time coming down
so hard on them? Won't they be judged
eternally for this? Maybe, it is also a
matter of the fact God cares for His people.
He often finds ways to bring a form of injustice to an end. To use a fairly famous example, God used
people both in the United States and England to end slavery. Yes many died to do that, but it's still a
matter of history that the right thing got done over time.
d)
OK, enough of the
big picture. Let's get back to Jeremiah
himself:
7.
Verse 4: For if you are careful to carry out these
commands, then kings who sit on David's throne will come through the gates of
this palace, riding in chariots and on horses, accompanied by their officials
and their people. 5 But if you do not obey these commands,
declares the LORD, I swear by myself that this palace will become a ruin.'
"
a)
Verse 4 is a
biblical "what if" statement.
It's saying that "if" you did this, then God will do
"that" and "Life will be good". Obviously after about twenty chapters of
Jeremiah giving us his "doom and gloom" for Israel's short term
future, he's either not serious or what I'm suspecting he's saying is "If
only you acted like "this" then God would act like that". Yes, we have gotten to a point where it
doesn't matter as this chapter alone will make clear by the end of it, the
kings of this chapter are facing undeniable "doom and gloom".
i)
OK then, so why
preach it? Why preach that the Israel
kings would get the kingly type of pomp and praise that comes with the
job? Why through the temptation in their
faces with Verse 4? I suspect it's a message
to future kings. It's in the bible so we
can realize that if we're pleasing to God in our leadership role we can get
what blessings come with that role.
ii)
John, what if
you're wrong? What if God is really
trying to tell these kings to only change their ways, they'd be blessed? What if this message if for them? It is.
I am sure God's being sincere here that they could have long term benefits
of being the king over His people if
they would just live as He desired.
Since we know that the kings listed here didn't repent, in a sense it
doesn't matter. Verses 4 and 5 are listed to show what "could have
been" if they listened and "what will happen" since they refused
to listen.
b)
That naturally
leads to Verse 5. Because the Israelite kings refused to do "Verse
4", Verse 5 is the natural consequence.
The short version of Verse 5 is God Himself is going to let His city (in
the sense it's the place where He unconditionally promised King David that when
the Messiah comes, He will rule the world from that city) is going down for the
count! It's because of the unconditional
Messiah promise that the destruction of Jerusalem can't ever be a permanent
thing, but a necessary one.
i)
The underlying
implication of these Verses is that a future king will emerge who'll be the one
who rules like "Verse 4" desires. Sometimes we Christians tend to
forget the fact that Jesus will return not to smile and kiss the children, but
to rule over the world as king. He will
be the ultimate "Verse 4 king" in that He will rule the way a king is
supposed to rule. One of the concepts of
the return of Jesus is to teach us of the proper way a ruler will rule.
ii)
OK John, all that
"pie in the sky" stuff may be true and I guess we believe it. What about all the horrid rules of the
world? Why hasn't God struck them
down? One of the things I always preach
is this world is a very unfair place to live. If there's no next life, then
yes, this world is very unfair and a lot of cruel leaders exist. What it is we must remember is God didn't
call us to fix the world, but be witnesses to if of the injustices that
occur. We're called to be
"Jeremiah's" not God Himself!
8.
Verse 6: For this is what the LORD says about the
palace of the king of Judah:
"Though you are like Gilead to me, like the summit of Lebanon, I
will surely make you like a desert, like towns not inhabited. 7 I will send destroyers against you, each man with
his weapons, and they will cut up your fine cedar beams and throw them into the
fire.
a)
The bad news of
Chapter 22 is we haven't even gotten to the verses yet where Jeremiah is going
to go down the list of the "kings of the moment" to list what they've
done wrong. I'd say the good news is this chapter is that it teaches us what
God expects of our leaders.
b)
Want to pause for
a second to comment on something a friend from my bible study group
stated. She said, "My friend said
to me, that she can't be a Christian. It's too hard. There is too much to do in order to please
God". The one making that statement wasn't a Christian. My response was in
effect, "If I'm a Christian, I'm free to do whatever I want to do, even if
it leads to a bad life. The issue isn't
what can I do, the issue is what do I want to do". That concept leads perfectly to this idea of
God's chosen leaders. He gives us the freedom to do whatever we want to do. The
point is if we're called to lead and we believe the Bible is the Word of God,
then whether we like it or not, we need to live by what it teaches and do the
right thing in as many situations as possible.
Does that mean perfection? Of
course not. It does mean we acknowledge God as the authority over our lives and
when we mess up it's a matter of realizing "God was right we were
wrong" and doing our best from there.
That in effect is what repentance is, realizing God was right and
changing because of it.
c)
Meanwhile, back
to Jeremiah. The point here is that God
thought of kings of Judah (those who descended from David) as being something
special. Let's face it, we're talking
about those were in the Messianic line.
Despite all the "screw up's" of these kings, they were all
descendants of David and relatives of Jesus!
The reason God thought of them as special is because they will lead to
Jesus ruling over the world. It doesn't mean they're better people than you and
me. It means they were chosen to rule
over His people at that time.
i)
It seems strange
to our ears that they would be compared to "Gilead to me, like the summit
of Lebanon". One has to read this
in context. Think of it as saying, when
I see you I see a forest of tall, beautiful trees. The area of Gilead (in Lebanon) is and was a
forested area with tall cedar trees.
Unfortunately, God said He has to "mow you down". The idea of a forest being wiped out is the
word picture here is meant as a comparison to how the Israelites will get wiped
out.
ii)
Jeremiah is still
preaching against the Israelite kings.
The idea here is "You know the army you're counting upon to protect
you? They're going to get mowed down
like grass being cut is the idea here.
iii)
It may help to remember
that in ancient warfare, cut down trees are used to build a siege against a
city. The reason Jeremiah used the
"tree reference" is because the Babylonian army did wipe out that
forest for wood on the way to Jerusalem.
One also has to remember that "Egypt" was the big prize of
Babylon with Israel located in the way.
OK, you get the point, let's move on.
9.
Verse 8: "People from many nations will pass by
this city and will ask one another, `Why has the LORD done such a thing to this
great city?' 9 And the answer will be: `Because they have
forsaken the covenant of the LORD their God and have worshiped and served other
gods.' "
a)
In my studies of
Jeremiah to date, every now and then I ponder the question, "If God was so
ticked off at the Israelites, why not just wipe them out with one big
swoop?" Why have the survivors
transferred all the way to Babylon as slaves after wiping many of them
out? Realize that one reason is God
wanted the "Land of Israel" to be a witness to the nations in that
area of what the Israelites did do.
Every now and then I also like to remind everyone of the fact
"Israel is where it is (the land)
because it's a natural land bridge between Africa traveling to and from
Europe/Asia. There's an ancient route
(called the Kings highway). It is just
east of the Jordan River. The point is
travelers on that road can look over at Israel and ponder why is it empty? Verse 9 (read it above) answers that
question!
b)
Keep in mind the
underlying message is the destruction of the Israelites still living in that
land. The focus of this chapter is on
the kings and their roles in being bad leaders.
What's the implication for us is the danger of bad leadership (failing
to live as God desires) can be the downfall of those under that leadership as
well as the leaders themselves.
c)
That thought
leads surprisingly well to the next verse:
10.
Verse 10: Do not weep for the dead king or mourn his
loss; rather, weep bitterly for him who is exiled, because he will never return
nor see his native land again.
a)
One of the things
I pondered is when did Jeremiah write this section. After all he writes about three of the
kings. Was it predictions before any of
them ruled? Was he just giving a
"scorecard" of what happened to each one? Was it predictions about each one combined
here in one section? If it was all
written before the first one came into power, why tell the Israelites about the
succession? Nobody knows as it was about
2,500 years ago. My guess is Jeremiah
preached to each of these guys then organized his notes later. Nobody knows, so it's all speculation.
b)
I bring that up
here, because from Verse 11 to the end of the chapter addresses three of the
final four kings of "Judah" (i.e., what was left of Israel in
Israel). Verse 10 is the final verse of
the "overview" of this theme.
So if Jeremiah is speaking to the leaders, why should they feel more
sorry for the survivors than those who are about to die? It's not that
surviving is a better fate. It’s the
idea that even those who survive (with the exception of maybe some of the
children won't live long enough to ever return to that land again.
c)
Let me explain it
another way: What God desires is not only that we use our lives to make a
difference for Him but that we're gathered together to be with Him? Jesus stated that in Matthew 23:37. So does that mean we have to move to Israel
to be a Christian? No. What I suspect the idea is when we're saved
in heaven, we'll all somehow be close to God.
No I don't know how that will work, but that's why I've always argued
that in heaven, we exist in more than three dimensions.
d)
Anyway, enough
"weirdness". The point here is
simply the fact that the land of Israel will be empty and that's a problem
because it's God's desire His people be gathered there as to be His witnesses
to the world. The reason Jeremiah tells
them to weep for the survivors is they won't get the opportunity to be His
witnesses in that land as God desires!
e)
All this ties
back to the main theme that destruction is coming and the leaders are going to
have to accept all of this. So if those leaders are in big trouble (as the
chapter implies) why should they worry about the survivors? To be a leader is to care about those you
lead. It's a matter of thinking how
"God thinks". His desire is for those who trust in Him to be close to
Him through prayer time in His word and time with fellow believers. That's why it is a big deal to God to gather
believers together in one place as stated in Matthew 23:37.
f)
With that said,
time for individual king condemnation!
11.
Verse 11: For this is what the LORD says about Shallum
son of Josiah, who succeeded his father as king of Judah but has gone from this
place: "He will never return. 12 He will die in
the place where they have led him captive; he will not see this land again."
a)
Time for a little
recall about the last few kings of Israel.
The last good one was Josiah. He
had a few sons and a grandson who were kings there before the final
destruction. The text here focuses on the first of his sons, called Shallum.
He's better known as Jehoahaz in 2nd Kings (23:31-34) and 1st Chronicles
(3:15). He reigned
for seventeen years.
b)
Also keep in mind that before Israel's fall, the leaders looked to
Egypt for help against the Babylonians.
So this guy went to Egypt to beg for help. Jeremiah predicts he isn't coming back, but
will die there (which is Egypt). That's
how his reign ended, being in Egypt.
c)
By the way as I discuss dates and cross references, realize God's not
going to look at us on Judgment day and ask, "Ok, name the bible references
to King Jehoahaz." If you desire to
learn about this king, I encourage you to read it. However, the important thing is that we do
use our lives for Jesus. The rest is for
learning purposes.
d)
So did Jeremiah predict this or just stating it as a mater of fact
after it happened? We don't know. I don't think that question is as important
as the fact that this king didn't rule in the way God wanted him to rule (with
justice). The bottom line is he didn't rule very long and in that sense he was
a failure as a leader over Israel.
Speaking of his failure:
12.
Verse 13: "Woe to him who builds his palace by
unrighteousness, his upper rooms by injustice, making his countrymen work for
nothing, not paying them for their labor. 14 He says, `I
will build myself a great palace with spacious upper rooms.' So he makes large
windows in it, panels it with cedar and decorates it in red.
a)
A little
background is helpful here. Apparently
this king built himself a nice big palace. It is not an issue if one can afford
it. The problem is he used forced
Israelites in to slavery to build this thing.
That brings up the issue of the bible and slavery. Two key thoughts:
i)
The first has to
do with Israelites themselves. It was
forbidden for the Israelites to make slaves out of their fellow Israelites (See
Leviticus 25:44-46 as an example). It is
what this king did to build his palace so that alone is an example of this king
not doing what was "just and right".
ii)
The second was
the issue of foreign slaves. Yes the Old Testament permitted it, but I'd say
the rules were so strict, the idea was to get the Israelites away from it. That is why the Old Testament had a bunch of
rules on how slaves were to be treated.
For example, a limit was imposed on how long someone can be a
slave. The main reason it was used was
to pay off debts. It's like saying,
"You owe me a $1,000? If you can't
afford work for me to pay it off".
No it wasn't perfect. It was
still better than how the surrounding nations treated slaves. By the time the Greeks then the Romans ruled
that area, slavery did exist, but it was rare for Israelites to own them as
such. My point here is that the Bible
made the rules undesirable to old slaves as it eventually lead to the end of
that practice by religious Jewish people.
b)
Bottom line here
is God's ticked off at this king for making Israelites slaves. So if this king didn't steal or murder, why
is this crime so bad? He did steal in the sense he stole the time away from his
fellow Israelites in order to enrich himself.
It's one example how God does expect us to be "just" leaders
as in doing the right thing. OK, let's
continue:
13.
Verse 15: "Does it make you a king to have more
and more cedar? Did not your father have food and drink? He did what was right and just, so all went
well with him. 16 He defended the cause of the poor and needy,
and so all went well. Is that not what
it means to know me?" declares the LORD.
a)
This is Jeremiah
saying, "You want to know how a king should act? Look at your father! He had a nice place to live, but that's not
what made him a good king. He did what
was right and helped the poor and needy and he is in heaven now as he did the
right thing as taught in Scripture. So is Jeremiah trying to put a guilt complex
on the son saying in effect "You're not the man you're father
was?" Yes. It's not that God didn't love the son
less. It's a case of wanting the leaders
to do what's the right thing. Since the
son knew his father, it is using an example he could relate to.
b)
I have to admit,
it's always tough for a young man to be compared to his father. Most of us want to be like our father if they
were a good man. I see Jeremiah trying
to encourage the king by giving him an example to live up to. The current king thought all I have to do to
be a great king is build a big palace.
Jeremiah is setting him straight on that issue.
c)
Notice the last
part of Verse 16 says, "Is that not what it means to know me". This is a not so subtle reference to the fact
that if we study God's word and take it seriously, then even if we make
mistakes, we will lead or (do whatever) by trying to live as God desires.
i)
Keep in mind the
issue isn't salvation but being a good witness to God. Living by God's rules makes us a good witness
for Him, and that's the issue. Obviously
the New Testament is our guide for interpreting Old Testament laws and that's a
big subject, but the underlying principal is our purpose for living is to be
His witness!
14.
Verse 17: "But your eyes and your heart are set
only on dishonest gain, on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and
extortion."
a)
This is the last
verse we get on Jehoahaz. Realize the guy only ruled three months
before he died. Apparently all he
focused on in that time was building his house.
b)
Still it was enough time for God to judge him. The fact he made slaves out of Israelites is
the reason we get the references to, "dishonest
gain, on shedding innocent blood and on oppression and extortion". Bottom line is this guy was bad news.
c)
Here's a
question, why does God allow some "bad eggs" to live a long time and
others get a few months? The bible
doesn't have any correlation between length of ruling time vs. a time where God
calls them home. Why is that? We don't know. Nobody but God knows how long we get to
live. We simply judge by the evidence we
see. God judges our hearts and knows our
actions. It's not the total length of
time we get to live, it's what we do with it, that counts. On that sobering thought, it's time to move
on the next king, the brother of the one who is "dead in Verse 17".
15.
Verse 18: Therefore this is what the LORD says about
Jehoiakim son of Josiah king of Judah:
"They will not mourn for him:
`Alas, my brother! Alas, my sister!' They will not mourn for him: `Alas,
my master! Alas, his splendor!' 19 He will have
the burial of a donkey-- dragged away and thrown outside the gates of Jerusalem."
a)
Anyway, this is
Joash's "son #2". He gets to
rule for eleven years. This was the
turbulent time when Babylon was fighting Egypt for control of the Middle East
with Israel being in the way between those two great powers. There's a historical debate about his
death. It is written in 2 Kings 24:5-6
that he died "in peace and was buried". However one version of 2 Chronicles 36:6 says
he was exiled to Babylon. It's a complicated
issue. Most scholars' suspect he died in
Jerusalem but was hated by his people and therefore did not get a great
burial. It's a minor issue, but if the
bible says this king didn't die well, I'll take that as "the truth"
and leave it at that.
b)
OK, John why
should we care about this stuff? The
issue isn't about ancient Middle East history.
The issue is still about ruling as God desires. Wait a second, if the great invasion by
Babylon was due to the whole country being corrupt beyond repair, why blame is
the blame focused on the king here? What
could he do if he was far outnumbered by enemies of Israel? If you recall from the last chapter, God told
the Israelites to surrender as then it is a matter of sparing their lives. Therefore, from the king down, people didn't
listen to all of Jeremiah's preaching in terms of believing God's word.
c)
Shorter version,
they're all guilty and suffered for it.
16.
Verse 20:
"Go up to Lebanon and cry out, let your voice be heard in Bashan, cry out
from Abarim, for all your allies are crushed.
21 I warned you when you felt secure, but you
said, `I will not listen!' This has been
your way from your youth; you have not
obeyed me. 22 The wind will
drive all your shepherds away, and your allies will go into exile. Then you
will be ashamed and disgraced because of all your wickedness.
a)
John's loose
translation: "King, no matter where you run too, there's no escaping the
fact you'll be judged by God." The
verses imply the fact he has rebelled against God since the days of his youth.
b)
As you read this
section, keep in mind other small nations around there were also scared of the
Babylonian invasion. The Israelites had
allies, but they were all outnumbered and a major end to many of the nations around
there (for example the Philistines came to an end who were around since the
days of Samuel). Bottom line this king
was accountable and it is not a pretty picture.
c)
While the text
was describing "rebellious since youth", let me ask, when does the
parents liability end versus the children?
Obviously it varies from person to person. The Jewish ceremony of Bar mitzvah, is just
that to celebrate that the parents are no longer liable for the sins of their
children. It's traditionally around age
13 or 14.
d)
Anyway, the main
purpose of this section is to state that there's nowhere for the king to run to
for safety. That's the reference to the
other foreign places in the area.
e)
That leads to one
more verse on this king before we get to my favorite part of the lesson:
17.
Verse 23: You who live in `Lebanon, ' who are nestled
in cedar buildings, how you will groan when pangs come upon you, pain like that
of a woman in labor!
a)
Keep in mind that
when the Babylonians destroyed Israel, it wasn't just that country, they also
destroyed what was and is known as Lebanon (just north of Israel) as well as
other of the smaller nations in the area. The Babylonians started a major
empire that was vast in its territory.
So why give this warning to Lebanon here in this section about the
Israel kings? I suspect like Egypt, it was one of the places the leaders ran
to, thinking they'd be safer in the buildings in the forest made out of
cedar. Think of it as a "log cabin
hid away". I'd bet it's here to say
in effect, "You think you can avoid God's judgment by running away, think
again buddy!"
b)
OK enough of all
of that. Hang in there, the interesting
stuff is next!
18.
Verse 24:
"As surely as I live," declares the LORD, "even if you,
Jehoiachin son of Jehoiakim king of Judah, were a signet ring on my right hand,
I would still pull you off. 25 I will hand you over to those who seek your
life, those you fear--to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and to the Babylonians.
26 I will hurl you and the mother who gave you
birth into another country, where neither of you was born, and there you both
will die. 27 You will never come back to the land you long
to return to."
a)
The big picture
idea is all of these kings (two brothers and one son of one of the brothers)
were bad news in God's eyes. Here we get Jehoiachin, the son of Jehoiakim. First the good
news, God's not going to quiz us on this.
I get the names confused and I've been at this a long time myself! All
we need to remember is that God holds us accountable for how we lead as these
kings are examples of how to not live as God desires!
b)
By the time this guy came on the throne, the Babylonians were really
dominating as they conquered most of the Middle East. Instead of doing what Jeremiah told them to
do, that is, surrender to the Babylonians, this king fought it out and suffered
for it.
c)
Jeremiah correctly predicted that both this king and his mother would
not die in Israel. In 2nd Kings 24:8 we learn he was taken to Babylon never to
return. Remember that Babylon did three separate attacks on Jerusalem. It was the second one where this king was
taken away and the final king (that we'll read about in a few chapters) was
taken away.
d)
So why is his mother mentioned?
The Israelite kings often mentioned the mothers who're the one's who
raised them. Often they had their own
thrones next to the king. It was their way of honoring their mothers. Anyway when Nebuchadnezzar who was the Babylonian king at that time, lead the army
to attack Jerusalem, he was tired of this king who rebelled against him and he
and "mom" got exiled to Babylon.
e)
OK John, this is
all boring ancient history. Why should
we care? I'll also admit, this hasn't been the easiest lesson to get through as
it required a lot of background research.
Yes, we get the idea that we're supposed to govern by the principals
taught in the bible. We get it that
these guys are all a bunch of "losers". Yes it shows that people are human and
there's bad leaders then as there was now.
The one thing to grasp is people may get away with a lot of stuff in
this lifetime, but there is a God who judges people. So even if we have to be living with bad
leaders, take comfort in the fact there is a God who judges fairly not only how
we live, but also how we rule over others.
f)
All that leads to
what I consider the fun part of the lesson.
Here goes:
19.
Verse 28: Is this man Jehoiachin a despised, broken
pot, an object no one wants? Why will he and his children be hurled out, cast
into a land they do not know? 29 O land, land,
land, hear the word of the LORD! 30 This is what
the LORD says: "Record this man as if childless, a man who will not
prosper in his lifetime, for none of his offspring will prosper, none will sit
on the throne of David or rule anymore in Judah."
a)
Let me begin by
saying the bible records he had seen children. (1st Chronicles 3: 7-18.) So how is that the text says he is
"childless" in Verse 30? The
answer's to read "the fine print" so to speak. The text says "As if he was
childless". If he as was so bad,
why does his kids have to suffer? For
all we know the children lived "normal" lives in Babylon. This isn't an issue about death as it is
rulership.
b)
Keep in mind that
God promised King David that one of his sons (descendants) would be the
Messiah. Therefore, when a curse was put
on the descendants of the current king, the joke is Satan threw a party as he
thought "he won the war". The
answer of course is that a virgin birth was necessary to get around that
curse. My point is to realize the virgin
birth isn't just a cute miracle God pulled off.
It was necessary to get around that curse. But John you said in the
introduction that Mary wasn't a descendant of the kings, just of David. It's a true statement. To explain further, I need to tell one more
Old Testament story.
i)
In Chapter 27 of
the book of Numbers there was a man named Zelophehad. In the story he had five daughters. He knew the land of Israel would be divided
by tribe. His fear was the daughters
would be married off to members of other tribes, as so to make the inheritance
less for one tribe when such marriages occur.
To solve this God told Moses that a man should marry within his tribe
and therefore whatever's "hers is now his". It's on the basis of that story that Joseph
became the legal father of Jesus due to that principal of adoption. That’s how
Jesus was the son of all those kings and got around the curse placed on this
king.
ii)
If nothing else,
it's a good story to share at Christmas time!
iii)
If you need
further proof, do a study of the genealogy in Matthew Chapter 3. That focuses on Joseph's family line and
mentions "Coniah" the nickname of this cursed king. My point is simply that God gets around this
curse in order to bring Jesus in the world.
c)
Meanwhile back to
the story itself. Why was God so hard on
this guy versus the previous kings of Israel? I think it's God's way of saying,
"This is the end of the road". Yes there was one more king who's the
uncle of the cursed guy. The reason his
uncle was put in charge, is simply because that's who Nebuchadnezzar picked to
succeed him. Since "Nebbie"
was the real power in charge at this point, what he says goes. I'm convinced that the reason a strong curse
like this was invoked, including using God's name was simply to get a point to
realize that God needed to "intervene in history" in order to bring
the Messiah into the world.
d)
So what do Jewish
commentators say about this? Simply that
the curse means none of his sons will rule and none of them did. They also argue that when the Messiah
appears, he's not to die for our sins, but just to rule over the world. Obviously I disagree with that view but I
wanted to present it while I was in the neighborhood.
e)
In fact, since
we're discussing the "Messiah, realize Chapter 23 (next time) will include
the fact that the Messiah is still to come in spite of the curse placed on this
family line. I'll save the details of that story for next time.
f)
For now, be
grateful we made it through this lesson on God and leadership. I know it will not solve a lot of current
political debate, but it does show God's standard for leadership. I will also
remind us that the New Testament calls on us to pray for our leaders especially
a leader we're not crazy about. When someone gets elected I don't like I then
remind myself of the fact that as a Christian, "I'm neither a Democrat or
Republican, but a monarch". All
that means is I choose to live with Jesus as my king and He's the true ruler
over my life. I keep that in mind when
the politicians I'm not crazy about impose laws I disagree with. I also try to keep in mind that God will
judge them as well as me.
g)
Finally keep in
mind we can complain all day long about politics but other than voting, it is
still a case of obeying who God places over us, for better or worse. So while we all take a deep breath to accept
our political leaders, let's close in prayer:
20.
Heavenly Father, We thank You that You've taught us what it is You
expect of our leaders. Help us to lead
and follow as Your witnesses to the world around us. While we can't fix all
things, You did call on us to be a living witness for You. So help us to let go of the things we can't
control and with the Holy Spirit's guidance, make wise decisions that please
You by how we live out our lives. We ask
this in Jesus name, Amen