1st Samuel Chapter 28 – John Karmelich
1.
My title for this lesson
is “God’s will for our lives and God’s judgment”.
a)
This is about the fourth
or fifth lesson where I emphasize the topic of “God’s will for our lives. I have to admit, when I first started writing
commentary on 1st Samuel, I didn’t expect this to be a series about
learning God’s will. It just happened
that way. ☺
b)
What this lesson focuses
upon is the fact that God does judge us.
There is a limit to God’s patience with disobedience. We don’t know what that specific time limit
is, but it’s there.
c)
The past lessons of
“God’s will” focused on what we have to do and not do to be in God’s will at
any given moment. In a sense, this
chapter is different. It is about God
saying, “OK, you can only be disobedient to me for so long and time’s up. It’s judgment time!”
d)
Let’s start with the
question, does God judge people hear on earth?
i)
Yes He does. He judges nations as well. Our problem is we never know if
something bad happening is a judgment by God or not. Unfortunately there are too many “Pharisees” around assuming
every disaster is judgment by God.
ii)
I do believe disasters
do serve some ultimate purpose for believers.
That is the idea behind Paul’s statement in Romans 8:28 how “all things
work for good”.
iii)
Further, God often
allows bad things to happen to us to get our attention. Let’s face it, we pray more when we’re hurting
then when things are going well.
e)
The specific issue here
has to do with judgment by God for a lack of obedience.
f)
In this lesson, Saul
learns he will die an untimely death the next day. The reason is because of disobedience to God. God judged Saul and pronounced sentence.
g)
Before you say this is
just an “Old Testament thing”, in the New Testament Book of Acts, there was a
husband and wife that lied to the apostles about how much money they sold their
house for, with the proceeds being given as a donation to the church. This couple was not required to make this
donation. Their sin was lying about how
much money they got for their house.
Peter predicted that couple would die in a matter of moments. God “struck them dead” pretty much on the
spot. (Acts 5:1-11).
h)
My point is God does
judge people. It doesn’t mean we are to
go around asking that sinners be struck dead.
☺ It’s amazing how we have senility when it comes to
our sins and great memory recall of other people’s sins. ☺
2.
Christians tend to get
confused on the issue of judgment.
a)
On one hand, Jesus said,
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others,
you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to
you.” (Matthew 7:1-2, NIV) To paraphrase: “Hey folks, what goes around, comes around. Have mercy on others just as God has mercy
on you for your faults.”
b)
At the same time, Jesus did
judge other’s behavior. He condemned
the Pharisees on a regular basis for their behavior. The apostles judged lots of people in the Book of Acts.
c)
When someone says, “You
shouldn’t judge people”, they think it is an end-all to an argument. My response is usually, “What’s wrong with
judging? In fact you’re judging me with
your statement of “don’t’ judge”.
d)
So should we “judge” or
“not judge” others?
i)
When it comes to
salvation, I don’t believe we should ever judge. Our job is to be witnesses for God. It is “His problem” as to who spends eternity with Him.
ii)
We don’t get points for
everyone who gets saved because we said something to them. Our job is to be a witness for God and then
let God work on their hearts.
e)
When it comes to
behavior, I do believe it is proper to judge.
The key is to do it with tact and with a loving heart. When you get aggressive, people get
defensive. To make statements about
one’s behavior in a submissive, loving way goes a lot farther.
i)
For example, one could
say, “You know, what you said awhile ago really hurt. I’m not saying I’m a better person than you, but I know that
you’re capable of being a much better person...”
f)
Tying this back to 1st
Samuel, Chapter 28 is mostly about Saul and judgment. Most of the chapter focuses on Saul and the fact that he gets a
judgment pronouncement on him by God, as spoken through the prophet Samuel.
3.
Chapter 28, Verse
1: In those days the Philistines
gathered their forces to fight against Israel. Achish said to David, "You
must understand that you and your men will accompany me in the army." 2 David said, "Then you will see for yourself what
your servant can do." Achish
replied, "Very well, I will make you my bodyguard for life."
a)
Every now and then I
ponder, who picked the chapter breaks and why?
When the text was originally written, there were no chapter breaks. Those were added around the 12th
Century AD. I want to meet the person
who made those decisions and ask them what they were thinking. ☺
i)
I say this because
Verses 1 and 2 fit real well with Chapter 27.
ii)
They have almost nothing
to do with the remainder of Chapter 28.
iii)
With that pessimistic
introduction, ☺ let me talk about these two verses.
b)
To recap Chapter 27,
David got tired of being on the run, and moved to Philistine country.
i)
Chapter 27 stated he was
living amongst the Philistines a total of 16 months.
ii)
David, his 600 men,
their wives and kids, lived essentially by themselves out in the country. They would go raid the enemies of Israel. They would bring part of the spoil to the
local Philistine king as a tribute (“taxes”).
David would imply that he was really killing Israelites in order to
impress the Philistines. David would
kill everyone in the raids as to not leave a witness.
iii)
None of this was
good. This is a period of time of a
lapse of faith in David’s life.
c)
By the first Verse of
Chapter 28, David had “sunk so low”, that the local king of the Philistines,
named Achish asked David to join him in battle against Saul.
i)
I suspect this was a
real temptation for David and his men.
They spent a good portion of their adult life on the run from Saul.
ii)
This was also a good
deal for King Achish. The king figured
David knew Saul and Saul’s battle strategies.
Having David on his side would be beneficial in battle.
d)
The story of David
joining the Philistine army will continue in Chapter 29.
i)
The story is
“interrupted” as the rest of Chapter 28 changes its focus to Saul.
e)
If I had to ponder why
these verses were included in Chapter 28, as opposed to Chapter 27, it is
because Chapter 28 is all about the consequences of not being obedient to God.
i)
David was told he would
be king one day. He was never told to
flee to Philistine country for “safety”.
This is David running away from his problems. David had a time of “peace and safety”, which was roughly 16
months. Then David had to face the
reality that he had sunk so low in his relationship to God that now he was
being asked to go fight against his own Israelite brothers.
ii)
The main story of this
chapter has to do with Saul. We are
going to read of the final days of Saul’s life due to his lack of obedience to
God.
iii)
The two stories tie
together as they are both examples of the “results” of a lack of obedience to
God in our lives.
f)
OK, onto the main story,
which begins in Verse 3.
4.
Verse 3: Now Samuel was dead, and all Israel had
mourned for him and buried him in his own town of Ramah. Saul had expelled the
mediums and spiritists from the land.
a)
Samuel died back in the
first verse of Chapter 25. So why was
it mentioned here again?
i)
This verse is not
to mark the date of Samuel’s death, but to state the spiritual condition of the
Nation of Israel at this time.
b)
This verse is saying in
effect, “Our recent spiritual leader Samuel is dead and the whole nation mourned
for him.” At the same time, the
occultists were expelled from Israel.
c)
This is as good a time
as any to talk about “mediums and spiritists”.
i)
First, let’s be blunt
about what this is. This is about the
practice of “speaking” to dead people.
The modern term is “channelers”.
Part of the New Age practice is the ability to “channel” the voice of
people who have lived in the past.
There is nothing new about this moment.
It is as old as the bible.
ii)
Let’s see what the Old
Testament says about “mediums and spiritists”:
a)
“Do not allow a
sorceress to live.” (Exodus 22:18)
b)
Don’t let the word
“sorceress” fool you. It is the same
idea as mediums.
iii)
Let’s see what the New
Testament says about “mediums and spiritists”:
a)
“The acts of the sinful
nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft….
I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the
kingdom of God”.
(Galatians 5:19-20 NIV)
b)
“But the cowardly,
unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers,
idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with
fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (Rev. 21:8 NIV)
iv)
There are some issues in
the bible that are debatable. When it
comes to issues like sorcery, witchcraft, mediums, etc. the bible is real
clear. If you don’t believe the bible
is the word of God, that is a different issue.
If you happen to believe the bible is the Word of God, then such
practices are forbidden for believers in God.
v)
As an American, I do
believe in free speech and freedom of expression. I don’t believe in capital punishment for such practices. At the same time, if you are a practicing
Christian, you should have nothing to do with this.
vi)
Let’s talk about the
“why” question. Why is such practice
forbidden?
a)
In a sense it doesn’t
sound so bad. Let’s say someone you
love recently died. If you could still
talk to them, you could resolve some things that were never said and be comforted
by them.
b)
I believe the key issue
is God wants us to look to Him for guidance.
If we are talking to the dead, you are focusing on looking to others for
guidance.
vii)
Does God allow Satan the
power to “channel” the dead?
a)
First of all, there are
a lot of scam artists out there. Many
people don’t have any power at all, demonic or otherwise.
b)
Do “some” have this
power? The answer could be yes. First of all, God wants us, out of our own
free will to choose Him. In order to know
if our choice is genuine, God allows Satan all sorts of “tempting powers” to
turn us away from Him. Those
temptations have to be “tempting” (for a lack of a better word) in order for us
to learn to choose right from wrong.
c)
Does that mean that
people with such power secretly worship Satan?
Do they have closets with statues to the devil? ☺ No.
(1)
The point is they have
no idea “what they’re messing with”.
d)
Christians are also
taught to avoid “entry points” into such spiritual worlds. This includes playing with Ouija boards and
going to séances.
e)
There are case studies
of people who have become demon possessed.
It usually begins being when they play with “entry points” into such
worlds.
f)
My point is that many
who are in this profession are harnessing satanic powers even though they don’t
realize it.
viii)
Meanwhile, back in 1st
Samuel. ☺
d)
Of all people, Saul
expelled these mediums from Israel.
What motivated Saul to do this is unknown. Maybe he figured “Well, if the “good” spiritual leader Samuel is
dead, we need to rid the land of “bad” spiritual people as not to have a
corrupting influence. For what it is
worth, Saul might have made the right decision.
i)
The point of this verse
is that Saul himself will consult a medium in a matter of verses. It shows another point of the lack of Saul’s
obedience when he goes back against his own commands to get a medium for
himself.
5.
Verse 4: The Philistines assembled and came and set
up camp at Shunem, while Saul gathered all the Israelites and set up camp at
Gilboa. 5 When Saul saw the Philistine army, he was afraid;
terror filled his heart.
a)
If you know your
geography and history, this verse will make a little more sense.
i)
The Philistines had a
military advantage over the Israelites in that they had chariots and the
Israelites did not.
ii)
Horses and chariots only
give you an advantage on flat terrain. Much
of Israel is hillside country. If a
battle takes place in a steep terrain with a narrow bottom (like where David
fought Goliath), then chariots do not have an advantage.
iii)
The place where the
Philistines assembled was flat terrain.
Further, it cut off Saul from the northern-most tribes and Saul had a
smaller army.
b)
Here we read again of
the words “Saul” and “fear” together in the same sentence.
i)
If you’ve been following
the story of 1st Samuel, since the early chapters, this is a common
association.
ii)
I’ve stated that the
opposite of faith is fear. When
one gets their focus on their problems and not on God, is when fear comes into
play.
iii)
Saul did not say
for example, “Well, God will protect His people and He has anointed me as their
leader. Who cares where the Philistines
are specifically located? Let’s go attack them!” Instead, he focuses on the military advantage of the Philistines
and his fear of losing.
iv)
In organized sports, if
you can put fear into your opponent before the game begins, it is over before
it starts. That is the case here with
Saul.
v)
Remember that the
attitude of the leaders will reflect the others as well. If Saul gets scared, I’m sure his soldiers
will as well.
6.
Verse 6: He inquired of the LORD, but the LORD did
not answer him by dreams or Urim or prophets.
a)
Saul did what most
people do when they get scared. They
start praying.
b)
This reminds me of a
classic bumper sticker: “As long as
there are math tests, there will be prayer in school!” ☺ That is the attitude of many unreligious people toward
prayer. It is the last resort when all
of their resources fail.
c)
Here is Saul in a tough
situation and he can’t think of a way to get out of it. Therefore, as a last resort, he turns to God
for help.
d)
The attitude of the
Christian should be the opposite. Jesus
taught to “But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these
things will be given to you as well.” (Matthew 6:33 NIV) “These
things” include all the needs of our lives (not all our “wants” but all our
“needs”). The point is God wants us to
seek Him first, not last.
e)
Let’s get into some of
the specific’s here:
i)
God did not answer Saul
by dreams. Saul probably went to bed
and said, “Lord, answer me in a dream what I should do here”. He probably woke up morning after morning and
couldn’t remember his dreams.
ii)
The next thing Saul
tried is the “Urim”. A great mystery of
the Old Testament is what exactly is the “Urim and the Thummim”. (References: Exodus 28:30, Leviticus 8:8, Numbers 27:21, et.al.) Most likely they were dice like objects used
to discern God’s will.
a)
(The Mormon’s argue the
Urim and the Thummim were special glasses given to Joseph Smith to discern the
bible. There is zero biblical or
external evidence to support this theory, but I digress. ☺)
iii)
What probably happened
is Saul asked a question, and the “Urim” said “yes”. Saul tried it again and the “Urim” said “no”. In other words, there was no consistency in
the answers to discern it was God’s will.
iv)
The final thing Saul
tried was to find a prophet.
v)
Saul may have had some
guy on his payroll. Most likely that
person or persons could not give Saul any special revelations.
f)
In summary, God was
silent here. We’ll get to the “why” in
a matter of verses.
i)
I should add that I
believe God answers all of our prayers.
When we get “silence”, the answer could be either “no” or “not
now”. In Saul’s case, the answer was in
a sense “no” to his questions due to a lack of obedience in His life.
7.
Verse 7: Saul then said to his attendants, "Find
me a woman who is a medium, so I may go and inquire of her." "There is one in Endor," they
said.
a)
Saul couldn’t get
answers from God, so he went to look for a medium.
b)
In Verse 9, we’ll
discover that not only were mediums expelled from the land, but also it was a
death sentence to practice such a thing in Israel. Saul was enforcing the command as stated in Exodus Chapter 22.
c)
It is interesting that
there just “happened” to be on in Endor, a town in Israel. If you’ve ever heard the term, “The witch of
Endor”, that comes from the King James Version of this passage of the bible.
d)
Whoever this person was,
she was willing to risk her life in order to keep her practice. It shows the enticement of its power that
people are willing to practice it.
e)
What caught my attention
was somebody in the throne-room “happened” to know of such a medium. Did the palace guards search and find this
person, or did they happen to know one?
It also shows that if you’re willing to go the occult route, there is
always someone willing to help you get there.
f)
What’s the application
of all of this for us?
i)
God designed us with a
need to worship Him. The same way we
have a need for food, shelter, air, etc. we also have a need to worship
God. If we ignore God, there are
substitutes available. One of those
choices is the occult world.
ii)
For most nonbelievers,
they choose other things to worship other than God. Find out where a person spends most of their spare time and spare
income, and you’ll usually find their “god”.
iii)
“Instead of believing
what they knew was the truth about God, they deliberately chose to believe
lies. So they prayed to the things God made, but wouldn’t obey the blessed God
who made these things.” (Romans 1:25,
The Living Bible)
iv)
The application for
believers is that when God is “silent”, we are to still trust in God
despite the circumstances around us.
Remember that God tests us. Part
of that testing is difficult times and times where we don’t “sense” God helping
us.
8.
Verse 8: So Saul disguised himself, putting on other
clothes, and at night he and two men went to the woman. "Consult a spirit
for me," he said, "and bring up for me the one I name."
a)
Let’s face it. If Saul went to a medium in “official garb”,
no medium would help him knowing this was a death sentence.
b)
This shows how low of a
spiritual state Saul was sinking to disguise himself to go find someone
performing an ungodly practice that he personally outlawed. So Saul got one of those fake rubber noses
and plastic rim glasses and went on his way.
☺
c)
Saul did the
“religiously correct” thing and outlawed mediums. He then failed to “walk the walk and talk the talk” and disobeyed
his own commands.
i)
If I had to pick one
word to describe the Christian life, it would be obedience.
ii)
The word “repent” means
to change one’s lifestyle.
iii)
Are we saved by faith alone? Of course.
What good is that faith unless we act upon it? The classic example is the elevator. If you have faith the elevator can hold your weight, how will
anyone believe you unless you get in that elevator?
iv)
My point for you and I
is nonbelievers look at our behavior far more than any and all words
that come out of our mouth.
v)
What do we do when we
mess up? Start by confession. God doesn’t expect perfection, but he does
expect obedience and to confess when we fail.
If you want to be good witness to your neighbor, apologize for your bad
actions and say it was wrong of me to do that.
That action can go a lot farther than quoting the bible!
9.
Verse 9: But the woman said to him, "Surely you
know what Saul has done. He has cut off the mediums and spiritists from the
land. Why have you set a trap for my life to bring about my death?"
a)
If you were a medium in
a town where it was a death sentence to do so, you’re not going to hang sign
outside your door saying, “Channeling available here - $20 per hour”. ☺
b)
This woman practiced
secretly and had to check out potential new customers and make sure they are
not “the police”. Essentially she is
asking, “Is this a sting operation?”
10.
Verse 10: Saul swore to her by the LORD, "As
surely as the LORD lives, you will not be punished for this."
a)
You have to see the
irony in Verse 10: Saul is about to
perform an act that is forbidden in the bible and considered a death
sentence. Yet Saul invokes God’s name
in saying he won’t punish this woman!
b)
Apparently, even though
Saul was disguised, the woman still assumed Saul was Jewish. Thus, she accepted his oath before God.
c)
Why would you take such
an oath seriously when you’re committing a nonbiblical act?
i)
God does consider oaths
binding. He cares about our reputation
for keeping our word. If we can’t be
trusted in keeping our word in “nonbiblical” things, how can we be trusted when
we speak of God himself?
ii)
Religious Jews consider
oaths binding no matter what the reason.
There are biblical verses to support this, over and above the actions
surrounding the oath. There are some
exceptions (e.g., to commit violence), but in general oaths are considered
binding.
iii)
This reminds me of Jesus
saying of “let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes” and your ‘no’ be ‘no’. (Matthew 5:37). The point Jesus was making was for example, If you say, “I swear
to God this is true”, does that mean we can’t trust you when you don’t invoke
God’s name in an oath?
iv)
This also reminds us to
be leery of those invoking God’s name, especially when they are committing an
act that the bible forbids. How
seriously should we take someone’s word about truth when they have no fear of
God in their life?
11.
Verse 11: Then the woman asked, "Whom shall I
bring up for you?" "Bring up
Samuel," he said. 12 When the
woman saw Samuel, she cried out at the top of her voice and said to Saul,
"Why have you deceived me? You are Saul!"
a)
I’ll start by saying
there are libraries full of commentaries on these two verses. Opinions by good scholars vary. Now that my disclaimers are out the way,
here we go! ☺
b)
This woman was able to
bring up Samuel from the dead. Reading
the next few verses in context, it appears the women did not know at this point
it was Samuel. She just knew that she
did something more powerful than was her normal custom. The Hebrew implies that she “did something
she never did before”.
i)
The “how” she
resurrected Samuel is a matter of speculation.
Let me give you two common views.
Nowhere does the bible indicate that demons, or Satan for that matter
can read our thoughts. Most likely they
can travel in and out of “time” as we know it, but they can’t read
thoughts.
ii)
Satan can plant thoughts
in our heads. When Jesus stated how he
was going to cross, Peter rebuked him.
Jesus’ next words were “get behind me Satan” (Matthew 16:23, et.al.) as
if to state that Satan himself planted that thought into Peter’s mind. I’m sure Peter thought those thoughts were
his own, but Jesus stated Satan planted that thought in his mind.
iii)
Given that, one wonders
whether or not channels can actually bring up the dead, other than this one
instance. A view is that because
demons can watch our behavior and the past behavior of those who are now dead,
those same demons can then give “true messages” about historical facts of those
who have died to those who are willing to pay for a medium’s service. The reason a medium can correctly tell you
about your past or your departed love one’s past is that demons have watched
your behavior over the years and can pass that information on.
iv)
The other view is that
mediums are “granted” the power to conjure up the dead or speak on their
behalf. Since that is what this medium
did here in 1st Samuel, the assumption is that they have this power.
v)
As I stated earlier, I
do believe that most of the “psychic’s” that are around today are con
artists. There is also a smaller
percentage that has some sort of demonic power at their disposal, whether they
realize it or not.
c)
The original Hebrew text
implies that this woman was shocked that she was actually able to bring up
Samuel from the dead. To paraphrase
her, “Woe, that’s not the way it’s worked in the past. Usually I get a “message-felling” in my head
and pass it on. I never get the real
spirit coming back from the dead. I’ve
never done this before!”
i)
The point is she was so
shocked by what she did, somehow she knew this was really a dead person
coming back again and she knew that the “customer” was really Saul. We don’t know how she all-of-a-sudden knew
it was Saul.
d)
Next, let’s talk a
little about life after death from an “Old Testament” perspective. The best information we have on this topic
comes from Jesus true story of two men in hell. One was in the “good part” of hell and one
in the “bad part” of hell.
i)
This story is told in
Luke’s Gospel, Chapter 16. It is the
story of a beggar named Lazarus and an unnamed rich man who was in the “bad
part” of hell. Apparently, there are
only two parts, as Jesus never mentioned any other section.
a)
(This is not the same
Lazarus that Jesus raised from the dead in John 11.)
ii)
A parable is an illustration
designed to teach. None of
Jesus’ parables ever have a person named by name. That is why the story in Luke 16 is different. Lazarus is in the “good part” of hell, as he
will be saved for eternity. The person
in Jesus’ story in the “bad part” of hell is unnamed on purpose as the
condemned are to be “permanently forgotten” by God.
iii)
Jesus’ story teaches
that the people in the bad part of hell can see the people in the good
part. The condemned man in the bad part
is aware of the “good section”. There
is a gulf (chasm) separating the two sections (See Luke 16:26).
iv)
One has to remember that
Jesus was the first “person” to enter heaven. The reason the good-people where kept in this “nice holding tank”
☺ in hell is the price for sins was still to be paid
for sins until Jesus died on the cross.
Paul stated in Ephesians 4:9 that Jesus went there prior to his
ascension into heaven. The reason, most
likely is to get those people in the good part of hell to take them into
heaven.
v)
There is only one other
“key” story of raising someone from the dead:
a)
Jesus did perform the
miracles of raising people from the dead, as well as some of the apostles in
Acts. Those people then died a second
natural death again and assumedly, went to heaven after that.
b)
The only other story
similar to 1st Samuel is when Jesus appeared with Moses and
Elijah. That story is told in Matthew
17, Mark 9 and Luke 9. To summarize,
Jesus went up on the mountain with a few disciples. All of sudden Jesus appeared “glowing white”, and Moses and
Elijah show up. (How did the disciples
know it was Moses and Elijah? Did they
have nametags? Did Jesus introduce
them? How did the disciples know which
is one is Moses and which one is Elijah?
I think about this stuff too much!
☺)
c)
In that story, we learn
that Moses and Elijah were speaking about Jesus coming (future)
death. These resurrected “saints” were
prophesying about a future event from the disciples perspective. (Luke 9:31).
d)
In John 11, Jesus said
He is the resurrection and the life (John 11:25). That statement may mean more than we
realize. It means that Jesus himself is
in charge of who gets resurrected, when and “how”.
12.
Verse 13: The king said to her, "Don't be afraid.
What do you see?" The woman said,
"I see a spirit coming up out of the ground." 14 "What does he look like?" he asked. "An old man wearing a robe is coming
up," she said. Then Saul knew it
was Samuel, and he bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the
ground.
a)
Again, notice that the
woman did not know it was Samuel as of yet.
b)
She described this
spirit as an “old man wearing a robe”.
i)
I have to admit, when I
first read that part, I was a little sad.
I always figured that when we are resurrected, we are going to come back
with new bodies in the “prime of our life”, not as old people. I don’t want to spend eternity as an “old
man”. ☺ Actually, the bible hints that are new bodies will be
“glorious” (See 1 Cor. 15:38; 2nd
Cor. 5:1).
ii)
Then I realized that God
“allowed” Samuel to be resurrected with this specific appearance. If Samuel were resurrected as a young man,
Saul would not have recognized him.
Therefore the physical appearance of Samuel was at an age and with a
robe that Saul would recognize.
13.
Verse 15: Samuel said to Saul, "Why have you
disturbed me by bringing me up?"
"I am in great distress," Saul said. "The Philistines are
fighting against me, and God has turned away from me. He no longer answers me,
either by prophets or by dreams. So I have called on you to tell me what to
do."
a)
We don’t know a lot
about the “good part of Hades”, but whatever it was like there, Samuel was
pretty ticked off that a medium disturbed him to bring him back! ☺
i)
It gives a hint that the
peace of heaven takes away our desire to be on earth.
b)
To paraphrase Saul, he
is saying, “Look Samuel, sorry to have to wake you and all that, but I’m scared
and I’m desperate. God won’t speak to
me and I’m in big trouble. You were my
spiritual mentor at one time, so I’m asking what should I do?”
14.
Verse 16: Samuel said, "Why do you consult me, now
that the LORD has turned away from you and become your enemy?
a)
My paraphrase of
Samuel: “Look Saul, if God is against
you, what makes you think that I could help, now, before or ever?”
b)
Before I get into the
main topic of this verse, notice the words, “Samuel said”.
i)
There are those who
doubt that Samuel was really was raised from the dead.
ii)
My response is “Samuel
said”. The text does not say,
“The ghost that bared physical resemblance to Samuel said”.
iii)
If you believe the bible
is the Word of God, then we must take the text at face value. Somehow, some way, Samuel was actually
raised from the dead.
c)
Now we’re back to the
theme of God’s judgment. There is a
“point of no return” with God. We’ll
get into the specific reasons why Saul had reached that point in a minute.
i) The application for nonbelievers is that there is a point where God does say to people, “Ok, you don’t want to believe in me? Fine, I’ll grant your wish.